Network & performance resources
XDP, DPDK, high PPS, packet filtering and network architecture.
Connect content to offers
The blog should point back to strong service pages so editorial authority turns into qualified pipeline.
Infrastructure
Architecture, handoff and high-PPS design choices explained.
DDoS Protection
Pillar page explaining mitigation, saturation risks and protection models.
IP Transit
Protected IP transit with BGP, clean traffic handoff and operator-grade compatibility.
Anti-DDoS Router VM
Router VM for customers who want to keep their own XDP, eBPF or routing logic behind Peeryx.
Anti-DDoS Dedicated Server
Protected dedicated server for teams building their own filtering stack behind volumetric mitigation.
BGP Blog
BGP, FlowSpec, handoff, routing-model and protected transit content.
Anti-DDoS latency explained: how mitigation affects real service quality
DDoS mitigation can add latency when routing, filtering or clean traffic delivery are poorly designed. Learn what really matters before choosing a protection model.
Read articleDDoS impact on a network: links, routers, queues and customer services
A DDoS attack does not only affect the targeted server: it can saturate links, routers, queues and neighbouring services.
Read articleHow to handle 100Mpps+ DDoS traffic without exhausting your infrastructure
Handling 100Mpps+ requires an architecture designed for packet rate, not only for Gbps: early detection, upstream relief, fast filtering and clean traffic delivery.
Read articleAnti-DDoS hardware vs software: what really protects exposed infrastructure?
Comparing Anti-DDoS hardware and software means comparing placement, flexibility, filtering speed, cost and ability to adapt to modern attacks.
Read articleWhat is a scrubbing center and why does it matter for DDoS protection?
A scrubbing center receives attacked traffic, filters DDoS noise and delivers cleaner traffic back to the customer.
Read articleHow does a DDoS scrubbing center work from routing to clean traffic?
A scrubbing center works as a chain: attract traffic, analyze flows, filter the attack and deliver clean traffic.
Read articleReal-time DDoS mitigation: filtering attacks before the service drops
Real-time DDoS mitigation means detecting abnormal traffic, applying precise filtering and delivering clean traffic before links, firewalls or game servers collapse.
Read articleWhy firewalls fail against DDoS attacks
Classic firewalls protect policies and sessions, but DDoS attacks target capacity, packet rate and state exhaustion before the application can respond.
Read articleDDoS mitigation architecture: from attack detection to clean traffic delivery
A strong DDoS mitigation architecture combines upstream capacity, routing control, fast packet filtering, service-aware rules and clean traffic delivery via BGP, tunnel or cross-connect.
Read articleHigh PPS attack mitigation: protect routers, firewalls and game servers
High PPS attacks can break packet processing with modest bandwidth. Learn how to mitigate small-packet floods before routers, firewalls, VPS and gaming services lose stability.
Read articleHow to detect a DDoS attack before it takes your service offline
Learn the practical signs of a DDoS attack: traffic spikes, high PPS, failed connections, abnormal UDP/TCP patterns, overloaded firewalls and degraded gaming or web services.
Read articleDDoS vs DoS: difference, impact and protection choices
Understand the difference between DoS and DDoS attacks, why it changes the mitigation design and when to choose protected IP transit, a protected server, VPS or gaming proxy.
Read articleUDP flood protection: protect servers, VPS and gaming traffic
A practical guide to protect exposed UDP services without breaking legitimate traffic for games, VPS, dedicated servers, protected transit and real-time applications.
Read articleDDoS PPS vs Gbps explained: why packet rate matters
Learn why a DDoS attack can be dangerous at low Gbps but high PPS, and how packet rate changes capacity planning for routers, firewalls, servers and Anti-DDoS platforms.
Read articleHow much does DDoS protection cost? Pricing models and criteria to compare
Understand DDoS protection pricing across protected VPS, dedicated servers, gaming reverse proxy, protected IP transit, tunnels, cross-connects and real capacity.
Read articleAnti-DDoS VPS: how to choose protection that actually holds
A practical guide to choosing an Anti-DDoS VPS without confusing basic hosting, real network filtering, gaming protection and protected transit.
Read articleEnterprise DDoS protection: protect critical services without slowing growth
A practical guide to enterprise DDoS protection for exposed services, hosting platforms, dedicated servers, BGP networks and gaming infrastructure across Europe.
Read articleHow Anti-DDoS works: from raw attack traffic to clean delivery
Understand how Anti-DDoS filtering absorbs volumetric attacks, separates legitimate users from hostile traffic and delivers clean traffic to transit, servers and gaming services.
Read articleMemcached DDoS attack mitigation: protect transit, dedicated servers and gaming networks
Memcached amplification can create extremely large reflected UDP floods. Learn how to mitigate it with upstream filtering, protected transit and clean traffic delivery.
Read articleNTP amplification attack protection: how to mitigate this DDoS vector
NTP amplification can turn small spoofed requests into much larger UDP responses sent toward your IP. Learn how to filter it without breaking legitimate services.
Read articleACK flood protection: mitigate TCP DDoS attacks without blocking real sessions
An ACK flood targets the part of TCP that should normally look legitimate: packets that appear to belong to established connections. The problem is not only bandwidth. High packet rate, spoofed ACKs and asymmetric paths can exhaust firewalls, load balancers, routers or servers before the application understands what is happening. Good mitigation must reduce the flood early while preserving real sessions that already exist.
Read articleDDoS amplification attack explained: why small requests can become massive floods
A DDoS amplification attack uses third-party services to turn small spoofed requests into much larger responses sent to the victim. The target does not only receive traffic from the attacker. It receives reflected traffic from many legitimate servers on the Internet, often using UDP-based protocols. Understanding amplification is essential before choosing protected IP transit, a scrubbing model or a gaming proxy, because the failure point is usually upstream capacity rather than the application itself.
Read articleDNS amplification DDoS mitigation: protect exposed infrastructure without blocking legitimate DNS
DNS amplification is one of the most common UDP reflection patterns because DNS is widely available, response sizes can be larger than requests and spoofed traffic can be directed at a victim. The mitigation challenge is precise: blocking all UDP/53 may stop a graph, but it can also break DNS-dependent services. A serious design separates open resolver abuse, reflected floods and legitimate DNS traffic before the attack reaches the customer edge.
Read articleSYN flood protection: mitigate TCP DDoS attacks without blocking real connections
A SYN flood is not only about sending many packets. It abuses the TCP opening phase to create pressure on connection queues, stateful firewalls, load balancers and exposed servers. Effective protection must filter early, avoid state exhaustion and keep legitimate users able to establish sessions.
Read the articleUDP flood mitigation: stop a UDP DDoS without breaking legitimate traffic
A UDP flood is not just “a lot of UDP packets”. Depending on the service, it can saturate a link, exhaust a firewall, trigger useless responses or disrupt a real-time protocol such as gaming, VoIP, DNS, VPN or a UDP-based application. Good mitigation is not about blocking UDP everywhere. It is about separating obvious noise from useful traffic, protecting upstream capacity and delivering clean traffic with low latency.
Read articleVolumetric vs application-layer DDoS: differences, risks and the right mitigation model
A volumetric DDoS attack and an application-layer DDoS attack do not break a service in the same way. The first mainly tries to saturate network capacity, ports, packet rate or upstream paths. The second targets service logic: HTTP, APIs, authentication, game proxies or expensive requests. Understanding the difference helps choose a mitigation design that actually works instead of relying on a generic Anti-DDoS promise.
Read articleBGP, GRE, IPIP or VXLAN: which method should you choose to receive clean traffic?
A protected IP transit guide to choose between BGP, GRE, IPIP, VXLAN or cross-connect after Anti-DDoS mitigation without breaking latency or operations.
Read articleDDoS protection over VXLAN or IPIP: when should you use them?
VXLAN and IPIP do not solve exactly the same clean traffic delivery problem after DDoS mitigation. This guide explains when each one makes sense, which limits matter and how to choose a model that matches your topology, edge design and operations. It also helps compare VXLAN, IPIP, GRE, clean handoff and post-mitigation traffic delivery with an operator-grade architecture, operations and buying logic.
Read the articleAnti-DDoS IP transit for hosting providers and service providers
Prefix protection, BGP, clean handoff and operator-grade integration for hosters, MSPs and exposed services.
Read articleLow-latency DDoS protection in Europe: why Marseille is strategic
Why Marseille matters for VoIP, gaming, APIs and services that need a clean and stable traffic path.
Read articleAsymmetric routing and Anti-DDoS: what you need to know
Asymmetric routing is not automatically a problem in Anti-DDoS. The real question is which functions require strict symmetry, how clean traffic returns to production, and whether the provider depends on mechanisms such as SYN proxy. This guide explains when asymmetry truly becomes an issue, why some providers tolerate it poorly, and why at Peeryx it does not degrade filtering quality.
Read articleXDP vs DPDK for Anti-DDoS filtering: which one should you choose?
The XDP vs DPDK Anti-DDoS question comes up all the time. This guide gives a practical answer for network and security teams: what XDP does extremely well, when DPDK becomes the right tool and which approach usually offers the best cost, performance and operations ratio.
Read the articleGRE, BGP or protected IPs: which model fits best?
The strengths, limits and deployment cases of the main anti-DDoS delivery models depending on topology and network control.
Read the articleLatency, asymmetry and clean traffic delivery
Why the traffic path, local egress and handoff model matter as much as raw mitigation capacity.
Read the articleDedicated Anti-DDoS filtering server: what is it really for?
A dedicated Anti-DDoS filtering server separates production from the decision layer, enables more precise logic and keeps the existing stack behind it. This guide explains when the model makes sense, when it does not and how to place it cleanly inside the architecture. It also helps compare dedicated Anti-DDoS filtering server, upstream filtering, clean handoff and production architecture with an operator-grade architecture, operations and buying logic.
Read the articleMulti-upstream DDoS protection: why one transit provider is rarely enough
A multi-upstream DDoS design combines several transit providers, routing policies and mitigation layers to reduce single points of failure. This guide explains what it solves and what it does not solve by itself.
Read articleIP transit latency: how routing, PoPs and DDoS protection affect performance
IP transit latency is not only a matter of distance. BGP decisions, PoP location, return path, tunnels and mitigation design all influence how users experience a protected service.
Read articleHow to migrate from a hoster Anti-DDoS to specialised protection without changing server
You can upgrade DDoS protection without moving machines, reinstalling services or leaving your current hoster. The goal is to place a specialised network layer in front of the existing infrastructure, filter attacks there, then deliver clean traffic back to the same server.
Read articleHigh-PPS filtering design
A practical look at building filtering layers for very high packet rates without losing observability or handoff clarity.
Read articleProtected IP transit benefits for operators, hosters and exposed services
Protected IP transit combines Internet connectivity and Anti-DDoS mitigation in the same delivery model. The benefit is not only attack absorption, but clearer routing, cleaner handoff and fewer emergency migrations.
Read the articleRouter VM Anti-DDoS use cases
When a router VM makes sense: keeping customer routing and filtering logic while still receiving upstream volumetric protection.
Read articleBuilding a filtering stack behind volumetric protection
Why some buyers want Peeryx only for the first volumetric layer while keeping their own filtering stack behind it.
Read articleHow to protect a multi-site infrastructure against DDoS attacks
Prefixes, protected IP transit, clean handoff and continuity across several sites, datacenters and cloud regions.
Read articleTalk to an engineer
XDP, DPDK, high PPS, packet filtering and network architecture.