← Back to blog

Why firewalls fail against DDoS attacks

Classic firewalls protect policies and sessions, but DDoS attacks target capacity, packet rate and state exhaustion before the application can respond.

Why firewalls fail against DDoS attacks
Firewalls are not scrubbing centers

Classic firewalls protect policies and sessions, but DDoS attacks target capacity, packet rate and state exhaustion before the application can respond.

State becomes a weakness

Classic firewalls protect policies and sessions, but DDoS attacks target capacity, packet rate and state exhaustion before the application can respond.

Filtering must happen upstream

Classic firewalls protect policies and sessions, but DDoS attacks target capacity, packet rate and state exhaustion before the application can respond.

A firewall is essential for access control, segmentation and policy enforcement, but it is not automatically a DDoS mitigation platform. Many firewalls are designed to inspect sessions, not to absorb millions of unwanted packets per second or hundreds of gigabits before the protected network.

This distinction matters for companies that believe buying a bigger firewall is enough. During DDoS, the bottleneck may be the uplink, state table, CPU path, logging pipeline or SYN/UDP processing long before application security rules become useful.

Protection model

Where Peeryx fits

Classic firewalls protect policies and sessions, but DDoS attacks target capacity, packet rate and state exhaustion before the application can respond.

The firewall is hit at the wrong layer

DDoS targets availability. A stateful firewall often receives the flood after bandwidth and packet rate already reached the customer edge. At that point the device must process packets the upstream network should have reduced.

If the firewall tracks sessions, counters, logs or application rules for every packet, the attacker can turn those features into load. Security depth becomes a performance surface.

Why this hurts sales and operations

When the firewall collapses, every protected service behind it can fail together: web portals, APIs, VPS, game servers and management tools. The outage looks larger than the original target.

For hosting and gaming, this is especially risky because one attacked customer can degrade shared infrastructure and create support pressure across the platform.

The practical objective is to protect revenue, support teams and brand trust, not just to make a graph look clean. A mitigation article must therefore connect technical symptoms to business continuity: what stays online, what is degraded and how quickly the client can recover normal routing.

What works better

Keep the firewall for policy, but put DDoS reduction before it. This can be protected transit, scrubbing, FlowSpec/ACL assistance, tunnel delivery or a dedicated filtering layer.

The goal is to make the firewall see traffic close to normal production conditions, not raw attack volume. Then it can do what it is good at: segmentation and access rules.

Before choosing a model, define the protected asset precisely: a full ASN, a single prefix, one VPS, one dedicated server or one game endpoint. The best solution changes when the bottleneck is upstream bandwidth, packet rate, firewall state or protocol behavior.

How Peeryx uses firewalls safely

Peeryx does not treat the customer firewall as the first absorber of the attack. The attack should be reduced upstream, then clean traffic delivered to the network, server or proxy endpoint.

This lets customers keep their existing firewall strategy while adding a mitigation layer that understands volumetric pressure, PPS and routing delivery.

This is also why Peeryx separates delivery models instead of forcing every customer into the same product. Transit customers need routing freedom, while gaming and server customers often need a more operationally simple path.

Protected IP transit Use BGP, tunnel or cross-connect delivery when the protected perimeter must sit before your server.
Open offer
DDoS protected dedicated server A better fit when you need compute close to the filtering stack.
Open offer
Gaming reverse proxy For selected game services where protocol-aware delivery matters.
Open offer
Technical contact Discuss capacity, routing and mitigation thresholds before production.
Open offer

Concrete example

An enterprise puts a 40 Gbps firewall in front of applications, but receives 12 Mpps of small TCP packets. Bandwidth is not the only issue; packet decisions and state handling become unstable.

With protected transit, the noisy pattern is removed before the handoff. The firewall still enforces policy, but no longer carries the entire DDoS burden.

Common mistakes

Sizing only by Gbps is a common error. PPS and state behavior are often the real collapse point.

Another mistake is enabling deep inspection and verbose logging during an attack. That can amplify the workload the attacker wants to create.

Why choose Peeryx

The right choice is not only advertised capacity: it is the filtering point, precision, clean handoff and the ability to keep customers online during the attack.

Related Peeryx resources

Protected IP transit Use BGP, tunnel or cross-connect delivery when the protected perimeter must sit before your server.
Open offer
DDoS protected dedicated server A better fit when you need compute close to the filtering stack.
Open offer
Gaming reverse proxy For selected game services where protocol-aware delivery matters.
Open offer
Technical contact Discuss capacity, routing and mitigation thresholds before production.
Open offer

FAQ

Is this only for very large attacks?

No. Medium-size attacks can be critical when PPS, state or protocol behavior hits the wrong bottleneck.

Can this protect gaming services?

Yes, when filtering keeps legitimate real-time traffic instead of blocking the whole protocol.

Do I need BGP?

BGP is useful for prefixes and transit, but tunnel, protected server or proxy delivery may fit other cases.

What should be checked first?

Capacity, PPS, routing path, service protocol and how clean traffic returns to production.

Conclusion

Classic firewalls protect policies and sessions, but DDoS attacks target capacity, packet rate and state exhaustion before the application can respond.

The right choice is not only advertised capacity: it is the filtering point, precision, clean handoff and the ability to keep customers online during the attack.

Resources

Related reading

To go deeper, here are other useful pages and articles.

Anti-DDoS latency Reading time: 13 min

Anti-DDoS latency explained: how mitigation affects real service quality

DDoS mitigation can add latency when routing, filtering or clean traffic delivery are poorly designed. Learn what really matters before choosing a protection model.

Read article
DDoS network impact Reading time: 13 min

DDoS impact on a network: links, routers, queues and customer services

A DDoS attack does not only affect the targeted server: it can saturate links, routers, queues and neighbouring services.

Read article
High PPS Anti-DDoS Reading time: 14 min

How to handle 100Mpps+ DDoS traffic without exhausting your infrastructure

Handling 100Mpps+ requires an architecture designed for packet rate, not only for Gbps: early detection, upstream relief, fast filtering and clean traffic delivery.

Read article
Anti-DDoS comparison Reading time: 14 min

Anti-DDoS hardware vs software: what really protects exposed infrastructure?

Comparing Anti-DDoS hardware and software means comparing placement, flexibility, filtering speed, cost and ability to adapt to modern attacks.

Read article
Scrubbing center guide Reading time: 14 min

What is a scrubbing center and why does it matter for DDoS protection?

A scrubbing center receives attacked traffic, filters DDoS noise and delivers cleaner traffic back to the customer.

Read article
Scrubbing center architecture Reading time: 14 min

How does a DDoS scrubbing center work from routing to clean traffic?

A scrubbing center works as a chain: attract traffic, analyze flows, filter the attack and deliver clean traffic.

Read article
Anti-DDoS guide Reading time: 13 min

Real-time DDoS mitigation: filtering attacks before the service drops

Real-time DDoS mitigation means detecting abnormal traffic, applying precise filtering and delivering clean traffic before links, firewalls or game servers collapse.

Read article
Anti-DDoS guide Reading time: 13 min

Why firewalls fail against DDoS attacks

Classic firewalls protect policies and sessions, but DDoS attacks target capacity, packet rate and state exhaustion before the application can respond.

Read article
Anti-DDoS guide Reading time: 13 min

DDoS mitigation architecture: from attack detection to clean traffic delivery

A strong DDoS mitigation architecture combines upstream capacity, routing control, fast packet filtering, service-aware rules and clean traffic delivery via BGP, tunnel or cross-connect.

Read article
Anti-DDoS guide Reading time: 13 min

High PPS attack mitigation: protect routers, firewalls and game servers

High PPS attacks can break packet processing with modest bandwidth. Learn how to mitigate small-packet floods before routers, firewalls, VPS and gaming services lose stability.

Read article
Anti-DDoS guide Reading time: 11 min

How to detect a DDoS attack before it takes your service offline

Learn the practical signs of a DDoS attack: traffic spikes, high PPS, failed connections, abnormal UDP/TCP patterns, overloaded firewalls and degraded gaming or web services.

Read article
Anti-DDoS guide Reading time: 11 min

DDoS vs DoS: difference, impact and protection choices

Understand the difference between DoS and DDoS attacks, why it changes the mitigation design and when to choose protected IP transit, a protected server, VPS or gaming proxy.

Read article
Anti-DDoS guide Reading time: 11 min

UDP flood protection: protect servers, VPS and gaming traffic

A practical guide to protect exposed UDP services without breaking legitimate traffic for games, VPS, dedicated servers, protected transit and real-time applications.

Read article
Anti-DDoS guide Reading time: 11 min

DDoS PPS vs Gbps explained: why packet rate matters

Learn why a DDoS attack can be dangerous at low Gbps but high PPS, and how packet rate changes capacity planning for routers, firewalls, servers and Anti-DDoS platforms.

Read article
Anti-DDoS guide Reading time: 16 min

Enterprise DDoS protection: protect critical services without slowing growth

A practical guide to enterprise DDoS protection for exposed services, hosting platforms, dedicated servers, BGP networks and gaming infrastructure across Europe.

Read article
Anti-DDoS guide Reading time: 16 min

How Anti-DDoS works: from raw attack traffic to clean delivery

Understand how Anti-DDoS filtering absorbs volumetric attacks, separates legitimate users from hostile traffic and delivers clean traffic to transit, servers and gaming services.

Read article
DDoS guide Reading time: 14 min

Memcached DDoS attack mitigation: protect transit, dedicated servers and gaming networks

Memcached amplification can create extremely large reflected UDP floods. Learn how to mitigate it with upstream filtering, protected transit and clean traffic delivery.

Read article
DDoS guide Reading time: 14 min

NTP amplification attack protection: how to mitigate this DDoS vector

NTP amplification can turn small spoofed requests into much larger UDP responses sent toward your IP. Learn how to filter it without breaking legitimate services.

Read article
TCP Anti-DDoS guide Reading time: 15 min

ACK flood protection: mitigate TCP DDoS attacks without blocking real sessions

An ACK flood targets the part of TCP that should normally look legitimate: packets that appear to belong to established connections. The problem is not only bandwidth. High packet rate, spoofed ACKs and asymmetric paths can exhaust firewalls, load balancers, routers or servers before the application understands what is happening. Good mitigation must reduce the flood early while preserving real sessions that already exist.

Read article
DDoS architecture guide Reading time: 15 min

DDoS amplification attack explained: why small requests can become massive floods

A DDoS amplification attack uses third-party services to turn small spoofed requests into much larger responses sent to the victim. The target does not only receive traffic from the attacker. It receives reflected traffic from many legitimate servers on the Internet, often using UDP-based protocols. Understanding amplification is essential before choosing protected IP transit, a scrubbing model or a gaming proxy, because the failure point is usually upstream capacity rather than the application itself.

Read article
DNS Anti-DDoS guide Reading time: 15 min

DNS amplification DDoS mitigation: protect exposed infrastructure without blocking legitimate DNS

DNS amplification is one of the most common UDP reflection patterns because DNS is widely available, response sizes can be larger than requests and spoofed traffic can be directed at a victim. The mitigation challenge is precise: blocking all UDP/53 may stop a graph, but it can also break DNS-dependent services. A serious design separates open resolver abuse, reflected floods and legitimate DNS traffic before the attack reaches the customer edge.

Read article
Volumetric mitigation 9 min read

How do you mitigate a DDoS attack above 100Gbps?

Link, PPS, CPU, upstream relief and clean handoff: the real framework behind credible 100Gbps mitigation.

Read the article
DDoS guide Reading time: 7 min

How to stop a DDoS attack without losing network control

A practical guide to stopping a DDoS attack while keeping clean traffic delivery, routing control and a credible upstream mitigation model.

Read article
UDP Anti-DDoS guide Reading time: 14 min

UDP flood mitigation: stop a UDP DDoS without breaking legitimate traffic

A UDP flood is not just “a lot of UDP packets”. Depending on the service, it can saturate a link, exhaust a firewall, trigger useless responses or disrupt a real-time protocol such as gaming, VoIP, DNS, VPN or a UDP-based application. Good mitigation is not about blocking UDP everywhere. It is about separating obvious noise from useful traffic, protecting upstream capacity and delivering clean traffic with low latency.

Read article
TCP Anti-DDoS guide Reading time: 15 min

SYN flood protection: mitigate TCP DDoS attacks without blocking real connections

A SYN flood is not only about sending many packets. It abuses the TCP opening phase to create pressure on connection queues, stateful firewalls, load balancers and exposed servers. Effective protection must filter early, avoid state exhaustion and keep legitimate users able to establish sessions.

Read the article
Anti-DDoS guide Reading time: 15 min

Volumetric vs application-layer DDoS: differences, risks and the right mitigation model

A volumetric DDoS attack and an application-layer DDoS attack do not break a service in the same way. The first mainly tries to saturate network capacity, ports, packet rate or upstream paths. The second targets service logic: HTTP, APIs, authentication, game proxies or expensive requests. Understanding the difference helps choose a mitigation design that actually works instead of relying on a generic Anti-DDoS promise.

Read article
Scrubbing center guide Reading time: 14 min

What is a scrubbing center and why does it matter for DDoS protection?

A scrubbing center receives attacked traffic, filters DDoS noise and delivers cleaner traffic back to the customer.

Read article
DDoS guide Reading time: 8 min

Anti-DDoS server for dedicated infrastructure

How to position an Anti-DDoS server when you need a cleaner edge before your own routing, XDP or application filters.

Read article
DDoS guide Reading time: 7 min

PPS vs Gbps in DDoS mitigation

Why packet rate matters as much as bandwidth when evaluating DDoS mitigation, filtering servers and upstream relief.

Read article

Talk to an engineer

Peeryx can review your DDoS exposure and suggest a practical model: protected IP transit, tunnel, protected server or gaming reverse proxy.